Blaž Dakskobler

My feedback

15 results found

  1. 10 votes
    2 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    First, consider changing the way you handle autogrowth, since it's better to keep DB files sized the same. See this for more info: https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/4937/expand-all-database-files-simultaneously-using-sql-server-2016-autogrowallfiles/

    Saying that, check if these custom metrics I wrote can help you out:
    https://sqlmonitormetrics.red-gate.com/percentage-of-usedavailable-database-space/
    https://sqlmonitormetrics.red-gate.com/database-growth-steps-available/

  2. 13 votes
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  3. 21 votes
    3 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 
    Blaž Dakskobler shared this idea  · 
  4. 19 votes
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Blaž Dakskobler shared this idea  · 
  5. 5 votes
    2 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    This is better now (not sure when the change was made... I noticed it on 7.1.4+)... the metric selector is changing width depending on the metric name length. Maybe a bit jerky, but still much better than before.

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  6. 14 votes
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Blaž Dakskobler shared this idea  · 
  7. 114 votes
    3 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    Take into account heap fragmentation as well

  8. 30 votes
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  9. 27 votes
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Blaž Dakskobler shared this idea  · 
  10. 41 votes
    5 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  11. 98 votes
    7 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Daniel Rothig responded

    Thanks for the suggestion – we’ll monitor how popular it gets

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  12. 133 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    Well, an alternative idea to achieve this (i.e. to eliminate spike noise) is to enchance zooming / dragging in Analysis graph with an option to "lock" X-axis and only zoom/drag along Y-axis (the suggestion was merged here, so I'm reposting it).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    Indeed - in case of extreme spikes you don't see the details you want to, making the graph useless unless you "zoom in" to a shorter time period, thereby often losing overview of the long term baseline.

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  13. 45 votes
    1 comment  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
  14. 14 votes
    1 comment  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    under review  ·  Adam responded

    We’re reviewing this and would appreciate any more context on what you would like to do with the information.

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  15. 86 votes
    3 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Daniel Rothig responded

    We like the idea – if this idea gains traction, we’ll look into implementing something like this

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base