Skip to content

Blaž Dakskobler

My feedback

15 results found

  1. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    First, consider changing the way you handle autogrowth, since it's better to keep DB files sized the same. See this for more info: https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/4937/expand-all-database-files-simultaneously-using-sql-server-2016-autogrowallfiles/

    Saying that, check if these custom metrics I wrote can help you out:
    https://sqlmonitormetrics.red-gate.com/percentage-of-usedavailable-database-space/
    https://sqlmonitormetrics.red-gate.com/database-growth-steps-available/

  2. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  3. 21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 
    Blaž Dakskobler shared this idea  · 
  4. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blaž Dakskobler shared this idea  · 
  5. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    This is better now (not sure when the change was made... I noticed it on 7.1.4+)... the metric selector is changing width depending on the metric name length. Maybe a bit jerky, but still much better than before.

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  6. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blaž Dakskobler shared this idea  · 
  7. 114 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    Take into account heap fragmentation as well

  8. 30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  9. 27 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blaž Dakskobler shared this idea  · 
  10. 41 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  11. 98 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Daniel Rothig responded

    Thanks for the suggestion – we’ll monitor how popular it gets

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  12. 126 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    Well, an alternative idea to achieve this (i.e. to eliminate spike noise) is to enchance zooming / dragging in Analysis graph with an option to "lock" X-axis and only zoom/drag along Y-axis (the suggestion was merged here, so I'm reposting it).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blaž Dakskobler commented  · 

    Indeed - in case of extreme spikes you don't see the details you want to, making the graph useless unless you "zoom in" to a shorter time period, thereby often losing overview of the long term baseline.

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  13. 45 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Adam responded

    We’re reviewing this and would appreciate any more context on what you would like to do with the information.

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 
  15. 83 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Daniel Rothig responded

    We like the idea – if this idea gains traction, we’ll look into implementing something like this

    Blaž Dakskobler supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base