Tomasz
My feedback
18 results found
-
37 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
126 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
5 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
16 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
A great suggestion. We are exploring this as part of a wider review into improving query tuning features.
Tomasz supported this idea · -
6 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
10 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
11 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
2 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
6 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
90 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
73 votesDaniel Rothig responded
Thanks Phil – we are considering reworking the upgrade process. If this suggestions gains more traction, we’ll prioritise it higher
Tomasz supported this idea · -
69 votesDaniel Rothig responded
We’re looking into this – no ETA at the moment
Tomasz supported this idea · -
83 votesDaniel Rothig responded
We like the idea – if this idea gains traction, we’ll look into implementing something like this
Tomasz supported this idea · -
153 votesAdam responded
We’ve made some improvements in this area but will leave it open so you can continue to give us your suggestions
An error occurred while saving the comment Tomasz supported this idea · -
183 votesTomasz supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tomasz commentedWe also should have ability to exclude jobd using job category, name, list.
Tomasz shared this idea · -
6 votesTomasz shared this idea ·
You should consider open source database.