My feedback

2 results found

1. Baseline machine metrics across cluster failovers

   18 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Suggestions  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   An error occurred while saving the comment
   Phil Grayson commented  ·  Feb 17, 2016  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…

   After failing over a failover cluster, you lose the ability to easily compare the current data with historical data. It would be great if the cluster name was shown as an option and selecting that would only show historical data from the active node.

   Save Submitting...
   Phil Grayson supported this idea  ·  Feb 17, 2016

2. Simpler Upgrade \ Patch Process

   73 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Daniel Rothig responded

   Thanks Phil – we are considering reworking the upgrade process. If this suggestions gains more traction, we’ll prioritise it higher

   Phil Grayson supported this idea  ·  Feb 17, 2016
   Phil Grayson shared this idea  ·  Feb 16, 2016